SCI Logo
 

SCI Honours

Username:
Password:

 
 
Click here to go to the Chemistry & Industry web site
 
Click here to go to The SupplyLine web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture web site
 
Click here to go to the Polymer International web site
 
Click here to go to the Pest Management Science web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology web site
 
Click here to go to the Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining (Biofpr) web site
 
 

Search SCI

Advance Search


Related Links

Awards book

Previous Richardson recipients

SCI Members' News


Research brings rewards for high flyers

SCI Process Engineering Group: Richardson Travel Awards

  Peter License   Nicholas Dinsdale   Peter Martin

Andrew Harris

Peter License Nicholas Dinsdale Peter Martin

Richardson Travel Awards are presented annually by SCI’s Process Engineering Group. They offer financial assistance to high achieving researchers who wish to present at international conferences. We asked five previous winners about their research and future careers:


Andrew Harris, winner in 2002
Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Sydney, Australia

  • What are your areas of research?
    I focus on green engineering and eco-technology — the creation of products and processes that maximise resource efficiency and energy usage, and have minimal environmental impact. One example is the production of paper from agricultural wastes, such as straw. Most of these processes make use of advanced types of fluidised beds.

  • What is the industrial/commercial significance of your research?
    The aim of my research is to develop new technologies that are several degrees better than existing processes to bring about improvements in economic and environmental performance.

  • Is your research mainly experimental, theoretical or a mixture of both?
    It is about 60% experimental — eg designing and testing new equipment — and 40% modelling. The modelling is very important for scale-up where we take laboratory measurements and apply them to industrial scale designs.

  • What have been your main contributions to your research field?
    Publishing a series of design correlations for a type of advanced fluidised bed that enables designers to scale up with more accuracy than previously.

  • Where do you see your career going — academia or industry?
    I think it is very important for academics to appreciate the types of problems that engineers in industry routinely face. So while I am currently leaning toward academia, I will try and keep a foot in industry by continuing the process design consulting work I have been doing. Recent projects include designing a bio-diesel refinery and conducting a feasibility study for a waste-to-energy plant in outback Australia. This type of work lets me see the sorts of issues that industrial engineers have and leads to interesting targets for research.

Nicholas Dinsdale, winner in 2003
Crystal Science Group, Lennard-Jones Laboratories, Keele University, UK

  • My research area is crystal science. Along with others in my group, I investigate the effect of using organic compounds to induce inorganic crystal growth, often resulting in novel crystal forms. The aim is then to understand the process by which crystal nucleation can be controlled by organic compounds. The inspiration behind this is the formation of bio-minerals in living organisms, which use similar organic systems as templates.

  • It is estimated that over 90% of industrial chemical processes involve a crystalline phase at some point, and it is almost always desirable in crystallisation processes to be able to produce crystals of uniform size and morphology. Therefore research into the control of crystallisation is important generally. However, ultimately, the greater specific significance of this type of research is likely to be in biological/medical fields, and it is hoped that advances will be made in the synthesis of biomaterials, giving the potential for replacement bones and teeth.

  • My research is strongly experimentally based, as my aim is to investigate and explain the effect of organic compounds on crystal growth. Theoretical work includes the use of crystallography software, which is used to predict crystal morphologies and visualise the molecular structure of crystal faces.

  • I have obtained several new results in terms of the effects of novel organic compounds, often assembled into supramolecular systems, on the crystallisation of barium sulphate and calcium carbonate (calcite). This work has been presented at two international conferences of the Materials Research Society (with the help of the Richardson Travel Award) and in a proceedings paper.

  • At this point (as a third-year PhD student) I would say I am more likely to consider a career in the chemical industry rather than academia. However, I know that this may well change as my awareness of the possibilities increases, and I am happy for this to happen.

Nishanth Gopinathan, winner in 2003
NSF Particle Engineering Research Centre, University of Florida, US

  • At the University of Florida I am working on a 3D simulation of triaxial shear tester for cohesive powder. In Leeds I was working on a powder packing algorithm that could pack materials of very complex shapes and structure.

  • Triaxial shear boxes are extensively used in powder handling industries for better understanding of powder flow behaviours. Packing of particles is a very important part of the problem as most of the particles are very complex in shape and behaviour.

  • I use extensive theoretical modelling. The modelling that I do here is using DEM techniques.

  • Developing a synergistic approach in solving particle packing problems combining shape acquisition system (X-ray micro-tomography) and a 3D packing algorithm to develop a better understanding of various problems in industry, such as segregation, fluid flow through porous media and thermal conductivity.

  • I can see a bright future in both academia and industry. Though I prefer academia; there is still a wide field open in industry where a lot of good quality research is happening.

Peter Licence, winner in 2003
Clean Technology Group, Department of Chemistry, University of Nottingham, UK

  • We are looking at using supercritical fluids (SCFs), in particular carbon dioxide as alternative solvents for carrying out industrially important chemical reactions. Current processes can produce large amounts of contaminated organic solvents such as toluene or dichloromethane, which can cause serious environmental and economic problems in terms of waste disposal and product recovery. Not only can these problems be reduced by the use of SCFs, but their application can often lead to increased selectivities in catalytic reactions.

  • This project is significant in developing new synthetic methodologies that offer the opportunity to prepare materials in a much more selective, environmentally sensitive way; very important in today’s changeable regulatory climate.

  • My research is almost exclusively experimental, but I always try to understand why things happen.

  • Apart from playing a role in the development of cleaner chemical reactions, I have had a significant input into the development of new high-pressure apparatus. This has allowed our group to make considerable advances in the areas of continuous reactor technology, miniaturisation and fundamental phase behaviour.

  • I enjoy carrying out research and developing new ideas about chemistry but have a passion for teaching and transferring my enthusiasm to others, especially youngsters. I hope to develop my academic career further and to continue to both educate and innovate.

Peter Martin, winner in 2003
Satake Centre for Grain Process Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, UMIST, UK

  • 1 I am looking at mixing of bread dough in order to develop a better understanding of the aeration processes and to develop predictive models.

  • 2 The large bread producers are moving to differentiate their products and produce different types of bread — for example speciality breads such as ciabatta. They are also looking to use more homegrown wheat, which is of lower quality since it has lower gluten making protein. At the moment they rely on trial and error to find satisfactory operating conditions for dough mixing whereas my research gives them a model that enables them to optimise these conditions for the particular product that they are making.

  • 3 My research has a strong experimental component — we have found the best place to do our experiments is actually at the bakeries of our partner companies rather than in our research labs. As well as experimentation, we also use theoretical fluid mechanics to understand bubble formation in soft solids.

  • 4 We have developed a simple but effective conceptual framework that provides a predictive model for aeration of bread dough.

  • 5 For the medium term I would say that my career lies in academia [rather than industry].

If you like to apply for an award, contact Monica Iglesias, Awards Co-ordinator, T: +44 (0) 20 7598 1505, F: +44 (0)20 598 1545, E: monica.iglesias[ at]soci.org