SCI Logo
 

The Society of Chemical Industry

Username:
Password:

 
 
Click here to go to the Chemistry & Industry web site
 
Click here to go to The SupplyLine web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture web site
 
Click here to go to the Polymer International web site
 
Click here to go to the Pest Management Science web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology web site
 
Click here to go to the Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining (Biofpr) web site
 
 

Search SCI

Advance Search


Related Links

Chemistry & Industry

C&I in the news

Comment on this article



Biology for Chemists

23- 24 June 2008

Biology for Chemists



Medicines threatened


REACH could leave drug companies without intermediates
, Cath O'Driscoll reports
Chemistry & Industry

pillsEurope’s proposed new chemicals legislation, REACH (the registration, evaluation and authorisation of chemicals), could potentially disrupt the supply of important medicines and push up drug prices, industry insiders say.

The legislation, which could come into force in April 2007, poses a serious threat to supplies of large numbers of intermediates and raw materials used in drug manufacture, David Vosvenieks, REACH issue manager at AstraZeneca, told an SCI meeting earlier this month.

Vosvenieks added that two companies supplying important intermediates required for two AstraZeneca drugs have warned they may no longer be able to guarantee supply.

‘While the possibility of this happening has always been on our radar, this has come as a rude awakening,’ Vosvenieks said.

A spokesman for Pfizer, the world’s largest pharmaceutical company, admitted the company was also in discussions with suppliers over REACH, but declined to say whether any particular products were affected.

GlaxoSmithKline is also reviewing suppliers, said spokesman Stephen Rose. But, he added: ‘To date we have not found anybody that has an issue that would cause us a problem from the proposed REACH legislation.’

Losing suppliers has huge implications. They are strategic partners, rigorously audited by companies’ global external sourcing teams to ensure their manufacturing assets are safe, that they conform to health and safety requirements and that they are using the right technology.

‘Finding a new supplier would be very much a last resort, and would potentially bring extra costs,’ Vosvenieks said.

A change in supplier would mean resubmitting a drug for evaluation by regulatory authorities. Substitute materials or intermediates would have different, albeit very slightly, impurity profiles from the original substance and would therefore need to be considered by the regulators.

A spokesperson at UK regulator, the Medicines and Healthcare Regulatory Authority, confirmed: ‘In the event that a company is unable to use the same solvent or agent in our authorised dossier, and has to use a substitute, the manufacturer would have to submit a variation for authorisation.’ Depending on the complexity of the change, reauthorisation could take 30 to 60 days, he added.

A lot of drug manufacture is driven by demand to cut down on costs, according to Vosvenieks. This means some that drug companies may not have sufficient stockpiles to see them through the reauthorisation period. If the reauthorisation process is not straightforward, or sufficient supplies are not available to cover demand over this time, in the worst-case scenario this could mean a delay with restarting supply.

Active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) are largely exempt from REACH, but many of the solvents and intermediates involved in the manufacture of the final drug formulation are not. This is especially true of chemicals used in applications outside of pharmaceuticals, Vosvenieks said, since these compounds may not qualify for the usual lighter or ‘postcard’ registration requirements agreed for other pharmaceutical intermediates.

The main chemicals affected will be hazardous chemicals, such as carcinogens or mutagens, which, along with high volume chemicals, are given the highest priority under REACH. ‘Such compounds are used in roughly 5-10% of drug syntheses,’ he said.

Many of the smaller or more specialist firms producing them may lack the resources to comply with REACH. ‘If suppliers can’t justify the cost of supporting a product because of costs, this could lead to one supplier only for a particular product, which could also drive up raw material costs. Or it could push manufacture out of the EU,’ said Melvyn Whyte, managing director of Whyte Chemicals.

For pharmaceutical customers, several options are available: stepping in to share the burden of compliance, outsourcing to a different, possibly overseas, supplier, or manufacturing in-house. Longer term, companies could relocate manufacturing so APIs are created outside of the EU, avoiding REACH altogether.

Industry bodies contacted by C&I seemed unaware of the problems. The European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industries and Associations has an expert body to monitor the impact of REACH. But spokesperson Christophe de Catallay said, ‘Seen from a broader perspective, REACH hasn’t reached the top of our agenda yet.’

Association of the British Pharmaceutical Industry spokesman Richard Ley pointed out that problems could be even further back in the supply chain.