SCI Logo
 

SCI: Regional and International Groups

Username:
Password:

 
 
Click here to go to the Chemistry & Industry web site
 
Click here to go to The SupplyLine web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture web site
 
Click here to go to the Polymer International web site
 
Click here to go to the Pest Management Science web site
 
Click here to go to the Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology web site
 
Click here to go to the Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining (Biofpr) web site
 
 

Search SCI

Advance Search


Related Links

Cambridge & Great Eastern Regional Group

Exposing the fakers, forgers and fraudsters

SCI Members' News







The art detective

Cambridge & Great Eastern Regional Group's lecture, ‘Science in the fight against art forgery’, by Nicolas Eastaugh of the Pigmentum Project and the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University
1 June 2006

A painting by Russian artist Mikhail Fedorovich Larionov (1881-1964), which Eastaugh recently analysed and found several key dating pigments
A painting by Russian artist Mikhail Fedorovich Larionov (1881-1964), which Eastaugh recently analysed and found several key dating pigments
Recent advances in the analysis of paintings are leading to a revolution in how we look at art, the people who made it and, perhaps surprisingly, the social and economic climates in which they worked. By looking in detail at the material structure of paintings we can learn much about the choices artists made, why they made them and where their materials came from. An essential strand in these developments is the application of various forms of analytical science.

In the international art market there are two key questions: ‘how much?’ and ‘is it genuine?’ For example, Rubens’ famous work, Massacre of the Innocents, painted in 1610, was largely unknown for many years and was even attributed to another artist, Frans de Neve. However, after authentification as a genuine Rubens, it was sold for £49.5m ($91.2m) in 2002.

When probing the physical evidence for the provenance of a work of art (setting aside the stylistic and artistic evalution), one starts with the basic structure – what it is made from, and what materials were used. Then one assesses the authenticity of the materials using various analytical techniques – such as dendrochronology for the wooden components of the frame or panels, and radiocarbon dating, x-ray and infrared analysis, polarised light microscopy, Raman microscopy, x-ray spectrometry, isotopic composition, particle size and morphology analysis to assess the physical and chemical composition of the pigments and other materials. Such analysis is difficult as individual samples are generall smaller than a pinhead.

In his lecture ‘Science in the fight against art forgery’, Nicolas Eastaugh described the way in which these techniques can be used to track specific pigments, using lapis lazuli (lazurite or natural ultramarine), lead tin yellow and the modern pigment titanium dioxide. Each of these involved a complex web of time-dependent factors including availability, geographical source and chemical composition (isotope) and production technologies. Eastaugh suggested that the application of Bayesian statistics may be necessary to collate all these diverse sources of evidence.

The way that the paint has been applied to a painting can also be informative, as artists generally have their own characteristic way of layering the various pigments.

Eastaugh’s lecture detailed the many techniques – from simple surface microscopy to the most advanced laser Raman analysis – that are used in the ongoing fight against art forgery. He also mentioned what other information – such as an artist’s particular technique or his choice of materials – can help tell us when, where and by whom a picture was painted. Eastaugh delivered a fascinating lecture, drawing together many strands of science and art (as well as geography, politics and economics).

There will be an opportunity to see Eastaugh in action, attempting to authenticate a painting attributed to Leonardo da Vinci in a Channel 5 television documentary, The Mystery Da Vinci, to be aired later this summer in the UK.

  • Dr Nicholas EastaughDr Nicholas Eastaugh is a scientific consultant specialising in the analysis of fine art and other historical objects. He has a background in physics and is also a graduate of the Courtauld Institute of Art. He is an honorary fellow of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University. The Pigmentum Project (www.pigmentum. org) is an ongoing programme to develop and catalogue quality data on historical pigments. Its cutting-edge research and superlative technology is dedicated to providing the definitive picture of the field. Eastaugh is overseeing much of the project as well as preparing entries for the dictionary and the optical microscopy books and developing the database.