We use cookies to ensure that our site works correctly and provides you with the best experience. If you continue using our site without changing your browser settings, we'll assume that you agree to our use of cookies. Find out more about the cookies we use and how to manage them by reading our cookies policy. Hide

Current Issue

19th February 2020
Selected Chemistry & Industry magazine issue

Select an Issue


C&I e-books

C&I e-books

C&I apps

iOS App
Android App

Funding science skills

Posted 19/10/2010 by KatieJ

While the details of the UK government’s spending cuts are being digested, there is one issue that has continued, and will continue, to run: how higher education is to be funded in the UK and how can the UK’s science-based industries find the researchers and skilled workers that will be required in future?

David Brown, the ceo of the Institution of Chemical Engineers (IChemE), says that proposals to allow UK universities to charge students unlimited tuition fees pose a ‘grave risk’ to both industry and potential students. In his recently published review of higher education funding and student finance, former BP chairman Lord Browne proposes removing the current cap on tuition fees of £3,290/year.

‘The engineering and process industries need all of the talent they can get; we must not deter young people, whatever their background, from higher education by the prospect of a mountain of debt – especially for the engineering and science courses, which are longer and costlier to teach, but vital to our economic future,’ says the IChemE’s Brown. ‘If young people are turned away from these subjects – or from higher education altogether – the nation will suffer irreparable harm. So if fees must rise, let them rise in a controlled way – perhaps to double the present maximum – and in a way that preserves access for all to the best universities,’ he adds.

Lord Browne’s recommendations, which have been approved by UK business secretary Vince Cable, do not propose that the increased fees would need to be paid upfront but would be repayable once the graduate’s earnings reach £21,000/year. But as IChemE’s Brown notes, chemical engineering graduates would be likely to begin repaying these fees sooner than many other graduates as the average starting salary for chemical engineers in 2010 is £27,500/year.

There is no simple answer to this question of funding. SCI bursaries provide financial assistance to some students, but what about industry itself? If companies foresee skills shortages in the future, what about funding the students that could fulfill these roles? This could be seen as an extension of apprenticeship schemes that are beginning to reappear, but could these approaches be successful in helping to maintain the UK’s competitiveness?

Of course the funding will have to come from somewhere. And this is before we totally understand how the 10% cut in science funding, said to be due to inflation, is likely to affect students, education and science-based manufacturing industry in the future. Cutting is often seen as a short term option, but one that must always be considered in terms of the impact on the future.

Neil Eisberg - Editor

Add your comment




  • Anonymous said:
    15/11/2013 05:36

    simfwnw apolita.to rodon einai me<a href="http://ajysfejmpv.com"> daifora</a> apo tous pio eklektikous stathmous stin xwra.euxaristw gia apeires wres kalis musikis. ps:(deite ligo tin metadosi mesw net giati peftei poli sixna :( )

  • Anonymous said:
    03/11/2013 10:14

    Nice that you're going to turn Mersina in a bilingual!As you <a href="http://ftbgjwgouj.com">prbaloby</a> know, my sons are bilingual.In England, they didn't actually speak Dutch back to me, but I spoke Dutch to them most of the time, that way, they at least knew the language passively. And so they picked it up really fast when we moved to the Netherlands.

  • Anonymous said:
    20/10/2013 10:24

    bravo sigxarhthria se olous ts elnies ..mas kanis perifanous.an eksereso t sfakianaki k ton alon ola osa eida me siginisan k mena k polus elnies pou poname thn elada latreuoume k agapame..apo poli makria..iperano olon i patris! http://ajyjibo.com [url=http://qedvsapfl.com]qedvsapfl[/url] [link=http://rgowbigm.com]rgowbigm[/link]

  • Anonymous said:
    17/10/2013 09:34

    xoris na perno to meros kanenos kai xwris na <a href="http://zlhzjr.com">gnzriwo</a>,den lete ta arxaia ta exoyn vgali eksw apo ta gimnasia?Epidei tynxani na ekana arxaia otan pigaina sto anotero gimnasio,einai dikaiologia ayti kyrie Ignatioy i akoma kai paradigma pou mas edwses arketo gia na toys aporipso aytoys toys anthropoys?I moy einai diskolo na dekto tetio megalo thayma,sto katw katw twra ton piran apofasi na mas voithisoyn na toys aporipsoyme?Kanenas kai kanenas den toys dexete,einai na pethenis tis pinas kai na min exeis kanena na soy simpastathi kai ksafnika soy leei kapoios ela na fame mazi,ti tha kanis tha to rwtisis poy vrike ta leyta kai soy kerna faei?I to poios einai kai ti kanei,mi xeirotera xasame tin alithia min xasoyme kai tin doyleia mas etsi paei kyrie Ignagtioy?

  • Anonymous said:
    13/10/2013 09:33

    I watch your videos and rellay appreciate the concentrated wisdom you share. Thanks for that. Re. money: If you were to learn that money is debt, would that change your view of it? Fact is, almost all the money in circulation has been created from debt. Without debt, there would be no money. Watch the well-researched "Money As Debt", available in 5 parts on YouTube if you want to have a peek into our monetary system. Yes to abundance, but if my sense of abundance is crafted from putting others in deficit, where's the wisdom there?